Effect of Digital Pedagogy in Ierventions in Rural Areas

Authors

  • Sona Ahuja Department ofPedagogical Sciences Dyalabagh Educational Institute, Agra
  • Diksha Yadav Department ofPedagogical Sciences Dayalbagh Educational Institute, Agra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2019/v9/i2/1385

Keywords:

Interactive Digital Pedagogy, Remote Areas, Pedagogical Satisfaction, Academic Achievement.

Abstract

The present study provides a description of the model of interactive digital pedagogy for remote areas and its impact on pedagogical satisfaction and academic achievement of students. This pedagogical intervention was designed to enrich and supplement the teaching-learning experience in remote and underprivileged schools through the use of technology. An interactive online teaching-learning system was set-up using a digital pedagogy. 150 school students and 80 prospective teachers from three higher secondary schools of Madhya Pradesh and Tamil Nadu participated in the study. Pedagogical satisfaction and academic achievement of the school students who studied in this set-up were examined. The results revealed that active learning, technological competence and learner autonomy were enhanced in an online environment when compared to an offline environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2019-11-01

How to Cite

Sona Ahuja, & Diksha Yadav. (2019). Effect of Digital Pedagogy in Ierventions in Rural Areas. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends and Practices, 9(2), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2019/v9/i2/1385

Issue

Section

Articles

References

Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From Teaching to Learning - A New Paradigm for Undergraduate Education. Retrieved from https://www.colorado.edu /ftep /sites/default/files/attachedfiles barrandtagg from teaching tolearning.pdf. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1995.10544672

Bebell, D., & O'Dwyer, L. M. (2010). Educational outcomes and research from 1:1 computing settings. Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 9(1), 4-15.

Clark, W. & Luckin, R. (2013). What the research says - iPads in the classroom, London KnowledgeLab. Retrieved from http://digital teaching and learning.files.wordpress.com/2013/ 03/iPads-in-the-classroomreportlkl.pdf.

Grimes, D., & Warschauer, M. (2008). Learning with laptops: A multi-method case study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38, 305-332. https://doi:10.2190/EC.38.3.d. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.38.3.d

Gibson, W. (2001). At the intersection of technology and pedagogy: Considering styles of learning and teaching. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10:1-2, 37-61. https://doi: 10.1080/14759390100200102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390100200102

Jesson, R., Mcnaughton, S., Wilson, A., Zhu, T., & Cockle, V. (2018). Improving achievement using digital pedagogy: Impact of a research practice partnership in New Zealand. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. https://doi:10.1080/15391523.2018.1436012.

Keengwe, J., Diteeyont, W., & Lawson-Body, A. (2012). Student and instructor satisfaction with e-learning tools in online learning environments. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 8(1), 76-86. https://doi:10.4018 /jicte.2012010108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/jicte.2012010108

Kupathil, K. (2015). Teachers, tablets and technology: What India's education truly needs.Retrieved from https://yourstory.com/2015/ll/indiaeducation - needs/.

Lowther, D. L., Inan, F. A., Ross, S. M., & Strahl, J. D. (2012). Do one-to-one initiative bridge the way to 21st century knowledge and skills? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46,1-30. https://doi:10.2190 /EC.46.1.al0.2190/EC.46.1.a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.46.1.a

Melhuish, K. & Falloon, G. (2010). Looking to the future: M-learning with the iPad. Computers in New Zealand Schools, 22(3), 1-16.

Montrieux, H., Vanderlinde, R., Schellens, T., De Marez, L. (2015). Teaching and learning with mobile technology: A qualitative explorative study about the introduction of tablet devices in secondary education. PLoS ONE 10(12): e0144008. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144008

Jesson, R., McNaughton, S., Wilson A., Zhu, T. & Cockle, V. (2018). Improving achievement using digital pedagogy: Impact of a research practice partnership in New Zealand. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(3), 183-199. https://doi: 10.1080/15391523.2018.1436012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2018.1436012

Stommel, J. (2014). Critical digital pedagogy: A definition. Retrieved fromhttp://www.digitalpedagogylab.com/hybridped/criticaldigitalpedagogy-definition.

Suhr, K. A., Hernandez, D. A., Warschauer, M., & Grimes, D. (2010). Laptops and fourth-grade literacy: Assisting the jump over the fourth-grade slump. Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 9(5), 1-45.

Twining, P., Evans, D., Ralston, J., Selwood, I., Jones, A., Underwood, J., Dillon, G., Scanlon, E., Heppell, S., Kukuiska-Hulme, A., Me Andrew, P. & Sheehy, K. (2005). Tablets PCs in schools: case study report for Becta by the open university. Coventry, UK: Becta.

Walsh, K. (2012). Study finds benefits in use of iPad as an educational tool. Retrieved. From https://www.emergingedtech.com/2012/07/studyfindsbenefits-in-use-of-ipad-as-educational-tool/.