The Use of Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, and the Metaverse in Education: The Views of Preservice Biology and Mathematics Teachers
Keywords:Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, Metaverse, Preservice Teachers
This research aims to analyse the views of preservice biology and mathematics teachers regarding the use of virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and the metaverse in education. The participants of the research consist of 24 pre-service biology and mathematics teachers. The views of preservice teachers on the use of VR, AR, and the metaverse in education were analysed on the benefits of using VR, AR, and the metaverse in education, with what subjects/modules they can be best associated, and what would be needed to make it most effective. The preservice biology and mathematics teachers demonstrate that the utility of VR, AR, and the metaverse in education is beneficial for increasing the quality of learning and improving the existing teaching methodologies. Preservice teachers believe that these technologies are effective for teaching subjects that require more visual material, such as organs, cells, ecosystems, geometry, and the geometry of space or solid bodies. Moreover, the preservice teachers draw attention to the need for infrastructure and well-informed individuals (students, preservice teachers, teachers) for VR, AR and the metaverse. The results provide value for pre-and in-service training, teacher training and designing the teaching environments for the future.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 Mirac Yilmaz, Meltem Coskun Simsek
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles published in the MIER Journal of Educational Studies, Trends and Practics (MJESTP) are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
- Copyright on any open access article in the MIER Journal of Educational Studies, Trends and Practics (MJESTP) published by Model Institute of Education and Research (MIER) is retained by the author(s).
- Author(s) grant MIER a license to publish the article and identify himself/herself/themselves as the original publisher.
- Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
- The Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 formalizes these and other terms and conditions of publishing articles.
Akcayir, M., & Akcayir, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/ http://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002
Arastaman, G., Ozturk Fidan, I., & Fidan, T. (2018). Validity and reliability in qualitative research: A theoretical analysis. YYU Journal of Education Faculty, 15(1), 37–75. http://dx.doi.org/http://doi.org/10.23891/efdyyu.2018.61
Aziz, N. A. A., Aziz, K. A., Paul, A., Yusof, A. M., & Noor, N. S. M. (2012). Providing augmented reality based education for students with attention deficit hyperactive disorder via cloud computing: Its advantages. In. Proceedings of the Advanced Communication Technology
(ICACT) 14th International Conference, (pp. 577–581).
Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators & and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355–385. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.19126.96.36.1995.
Basaran, M., Nacar, E., Nacar, G., Tufekci, H., & Vural, O. F. (2022). Teacher Opinions on the applicability of augmented reality (AR) applications in preschool period. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 62, 135–157.
Damar, M. (2021). Metaverse and education technology. In. T. Talan (Ed.), Digitalization and new approaches in education, (pp169–192). Istanbul: Efe Academy.
Dionisio, J. D. N., BurnsIii III, W. G.W. G. B., & Gilbert, R. (2013). 3D virtual worlds and the metaverse: Current status and future possibilities. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 45(3), 1–38. http://dx.doi.org/ http://doi.org/10.1145/2480741.2480751
Erbas, C., & Demirer, V. (2015). Virtual and augmented reality applications in education. In. B. Akkoyunlu, A. Isman, & H. F. Odabasi (Eds.), Educational technology readings, (pp. 131–148). Ankara: Ayrinti Publications.
Fernandez, M. (2017). Augmented-virtual reality: How to improve education systems. Higher Learning Research Communications, 7(1), 1–15. http://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v7i1.373
Fernandez-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernandez-Cerero, J., & Garcia-Martinez, I. (2022). Digital competencies for teacher professional development. Systematic review. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(4), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1827389
Ivanova, M., & Ivanov, G. (2011). Enhancement of learning and teaching in computer graphics through marker augmented reality technology. International Journal on New Computer Architectures and Their Applications, 1(1), 176–184.
Jeon, J., & Jung, S. K. (2021). Exploring the educational applicability of Metaverse based platforms. 2021. Academic Proceedings of the Society for Information, 12(2), 2021, 361-368.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1995). Designing qualitative research (2nd Edition). London: SAGE Publications.
Merriam, S. B. (2013). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. S. Turan (Trans. (Ed.)). Ankara: Nobel.
Michos, K., & D. Hernandez-Leo, D.. (2020). CIDA: A collective inquiry framework to study and support teachers as designers in technological environments. Computers & and Education, 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103679
Miles, B. M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An extended sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Mystakidis, S. (2022). Metaverse. Encyclopedia. Encyclopaedia, 2(1), 486-–497. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia2010031
Mystakidis, S., & Christopoulos, A. (2022). Teacher perceptions on virtual reality escape rooms for STEM education. Information, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/info13030136
Mystakidis, S., Fragkaki, M., & Filippousis, G. (2021). Ready teacher one: Virtual and augmented reality online professional development for K-12 school teachers. Computers, 10(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/computers10100134
Mystakidis, S., Papantzikos, G., & Stylios, C. (2021, September 24-–26). Virtual reality escape rooms for STEM education in industry 4.0: Greek teachers perspectives [Conference presentation]. 2021. 6th South-East Europe Design Automation, Computer Engineering, Computer Networks and Social Media Conference, Preveza, Greece, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEEDA-CECNSM53056.2021.9566265
Penprase, B. E. (2018). The fourth industrial revolutionIndustrial Revolution and higher education. In N.W.Gleason(Ed.), Higher education in the era of the fourth industrial revolution, (pp.207-229). Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, 23, 207–229. https://doi.org/10.25073/0866-773X/89.
Radu, I. (2012, November). Why should my students use AR? A comparative review of the educational impacts of augmented-reality. 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), 2012 (pp. 313–314). IEEE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2012.6402590.
Sirakaya,M.,& Sirakaya, A.(2018).Trends in educational augmented reality studies: A systematic review. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 6(2), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.17220/mojet.2018.02.005
Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London: SAGE PublicationPublications.
Uzun Hazneci, O. (2019, October 26-28). A study on the use of current augmented reality applications in education [Conference presentation]. Ondokuz Mayis University International 100th Year Education Symposium, Samsun, Turkiye.
Wojciechowski, R., & Cellary, W. (2013). Evaluation of learners' attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality environments. Computers and Education, 68, 570–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.014.
Wurdinger, S., & Allison, P. (2017). Faculty perceptions and use of experiential learning in higher education. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 13(1), 15–26. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/188130/