METACOGNITIVE READING STRATEGIES IN RELATIONSHIP WITH SCHOLASTIC ACHIEVEMENT IN SCIENCE OF IX STANDARD STUDENTS OF ENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOLS IN AURANGABAD CITY

Authors

  • Farhat Ayuub Khan Acting Principal, J.D.E.S College, Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh, India
  • Suhail Ahmed Khan Principal, Marathwada College of Education, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2013/v3/i1/1564

Keywords:

Metacognition, Metacognitive Strategies, Scholastic Achievement in Science.

Abstract

Metacognition is “thinking about thinking†or a higher thinking method. Metacognition involves activities such as planning how to approach a learning task, monitoring comprehension, and evaluating the progress. Metacognition is used by people on everyday basis. For example, after reading a paragraph the reader may ask himself questions about the text. If the reader cannot answer his own questions then he must go back and reread or use some metacognitive strategies for better understanding. This study throws light on the metacognitive reading strategies of IX standard students of English medium schools of Aurangabad city and explore their relationship with their scholastic achievement in science. The study was carried out on 100 students of IX standard from English medium schools of Aurangabad city. The metacognitive strategies used by students were measured by a tool “Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies†prepared by Mokhtari and Richard (2002). The findings reveal that there is positive and moderate relationship between metacognitive reading strategies and scholastic achievement in science. It is also revealed from the findings that female students are better in metacognitive strategies than male students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2013-05-10

How to Cite

Farhat Ayuub Khan, & Suhail Ahmed Khan. (2013). METACOGNITIVE READING STRATEGIES IN RELATIONSHIP WITH SCHOLASTIC ACHIEVEMENT IN SCIENCE OF IX STANDARD STUDENTS OF ENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOLS IN AURANGABAD CITY. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends and Practices, 3(1), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2013/v3/i1/1564

Issue

Section

Articles

References

Cetinkaya, P., & Erktin, E. (2002). Assessment of metacognition and its relationship with reading comprehension, achievement, and aptitude. Bogaziçi University Journal of Education, 19(1), 1-11.

Carr, M., Kurtz, B. E., Schneider, W., Turner, L. A., & Borkowski, J. G. (1989).

Strategy acquisition and transfer among German and American children: Environmental Influences on Metacognitive Development. Developmental Psychology, 25, 765-771.

Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive development inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.

Flavell, J.H. (1987). Speculation about the nature and development of metacognition. In Weiner, F.E., and Kluwe, R.H., (Eds.), Metacognition, Motivation and understanding. (p21-29). Hillside, New Jersey. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Handbook of Metacognition in Education (2011). Retrieved from http://www4.ncsu.edu/~jlnietfe/Metacog_Articles.html. International Journal of Research & Method in Educational Psychology, 23(2), 273-278.

Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognition development. Current Direction in Psychological Science, 178-181.

Livingston, J.A. (1997). Metacognition: An overview. Retrieved from http://gse.buffalo.edu/fas/shuell/cep564/metacog.htm.

Miller, T.M., & Geraci, L. (2010). Training metacognition in the classroom: the influence of incentives and feedback on exam predictions. Published online Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011q

Miller, T.M., & Geraci, L. (2011). Metacognition and learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, 303- 314. Retrieved from http://www4.ncsu.edu /~jlnietfe/Metacog_Articles.html

White, B., Frederickson, J., & Collins, A. (2009). The interplay of scientific inquiry and metacognition. In Hacker J.D., & Graesser A.C., (Eds.). Handbook of metacognition in education. (pp175-205). New York. Retrieved from http://www4.ncsu.edu/~jlnietfe/Metacog_Articles.html

Wilson, N.S., & Haiyan, B., (2010). Metacognition and Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 5 (3), 269-288.

Young, A.E. (2010). Explorations of Metacognition among Academically Talented Middle and High School Mathematics Students. ProQuest LLC, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley. (ED519181) Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov.

Zile, V., & Tamsen, C.M. (1994). The role of motivation in metacognitive selfregulation. Unpublished manuscript, State University of New York at Buffalo.