Compulsory Science Policy: Enhancing Gender Equality In Education? A Case Study Of Academic Achievement In Uganda
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2013/v3/i2/1518Keywords:
Science Policy, Equity, Equality, Self-Concept, Academic Performance.Abstract
This paper communicates the results of a diagnostic evaluation of the performance of boys and girls in physical sciences at Ordinary level in Uganda after the adoption of the compulsory science policy. The objectives of the study were twofold: to examine the academic performance of boys and girls in the Uganda National Examinations from 2007 to 2010, and to highlight key factors that continue to influence the achievement of students, especially girls in sciences. Data was obtained from five co-educational secondary schools using documentary reviews, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. The results revealed that the performance of both boys and girls have further declined after the implementation of the compulsory science policy. However, in comparison to the boys, girls in co-educational schools were still more likely to be among the poorest performers in sciences. This was attributed to a number of factors, key among them being girls' self-concept in sciences, and teachers' perception of girls' abilities in sciences. These findings reiterate the need to mainstream gender into both policy design and implementation.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Joyce Ayikoru Asiimwe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles published in the MIER Journal of Educational Studies, Trends and Practics (MJESTP) are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
- Copyright on any open access article in the MIER Journal of Educational Studies, Trends and Practics (MJESTP) published by Model Institute of Education and Research (MIER) is retained by the author(s).
- Author(s) grant MIER a license to publish the article and identify himself/herself/themselves as the original publisher.
- Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
- The Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 formalizes these and other terms and conditions of publishing articles.
References
Acker, S. (Ed.). (1984). Women and Education. London, Kogan Page Ltd.
Akankwasa, R.R. (1997). “Teachers and National Development in Uganda”.
Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate studies and research, Edmonton, Alberta.
Asiimwe, J.A. (2007). Teaching and Learning Sciences for Development: A matter of Teacher Competence? A Case Study of Uganda. Population Studies and Development, 14(1&2), 65-74.
Assie-Lumumba, N. T. (2001). “Gender, Access to Learning and Production of Knowledge in Africa”. In AAWORD/AFARD (2001). Visions of Gender Theories and Social Development in Africa: Harnessing Knowledge for Social Justice and Equality, Dakar, AAWORD.
Coombs, H.P. (1985). The World Crisis in Education: The View From The Eighties. London, Oxford University Press.
Ezewu, E. (1983). Sociology of Education. Hongkong: Longman.
Hambrick, A. (2006). Critical Issue: Remembering the child: On Equity and Inclusion in Mathematics and Science Classrooms. Retrieved on January 12, 2011 from content /cntareas/math /ma800.htm.
Harry, B., (2009). Educational Equity and Educational Equality. Retrieved on January 10, 2012 from http://crookedtimber.org/ 2009/03/31/ educational equity-and-educational equality/.
Herrera, L.M. (2007). “ Equity, Equality and Equivalence - A Contribution in search for conceptual definitions and a comparative methodology. Retrieved on May 19, 2012 from http://www.Sc.ehu.es/sfwseec/reec/ reec13/reec1312.pdf.
Karabel, J., & Halsey, A.H. (Eds.). (1977). Power and Ideology in Education. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
Kwesiga, J.C. ( 2002). Women's Access to Higher Education in Africa. Uganda's Experience. Kampala: Fountain Publishers.
Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (1998). Science for all, including students from nonEnglish language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 27(3), 1-10.
Meuret, D. (2001): A system of equity indicators for educational systems, in L. M. Herrera, “ Equity, Equality and Equivalence- A Contribution in search for conceptual definitions and a comparative methodology. Retrieved on 19 May 2012 from http://www.Sc.ehu.es /sfwseec /reec /reec13/reec1312.pdf.
Mulemwa, J. (1999). Scientific, Technical and Vocational Education of Girls in Africa: Guidelines for Programme Planning, UNESCO Education Sector.
Republic of Uganda, (2010). The National Development Plan 2010/11 – 2014/15. Retrieved on May 22, 2012 from http://www.npa.ug /docs /NDP2.pdf.
SESEMAT, (2008). Progress Report. Retrieved on January 13, 2012 from http://www.education.go.ug.
UN Millennium Project, 2006, cited in Asiimwe, J.A., 2007, 'Teaching and learning sciences for development: A matter of teacher competence? A Case Study of Uganda. In Tanzanian Journal of Population Studies and Development, 14(1 & 2) , 65.
UNESCO 2000. “Gender equality and equity: A summary review of UNESCO's accomplishments since the Fourth World Conference on Women (Beijing 1995)”. Unit for the Promotion of the Status of Women and Gender Equality, UNESCO. Retrieved on October 26, 2011 from http://unesdoc.unesco.org /images/ 0012 / 001211 / 121145e.pdf.
