Problems of End Users Associated With Curriculum Change

Authors

  • Dr. Muhammad Ramzan Department of Educational Training, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur
  • Shahida Jalal Government Federal School, Bahawalpur
  • Nasreen Akhtar Department of Education, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2015/v5/i2/1488

Keywords:

Federal Schools, Curriculum Changes.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to share, publicise and to identify the problems of end users associated with curriculum change at Federal Government secondary school. The study is descriptive in nature. For data collection two separate questionnaires, i.e., one for teachers and another for students were developed on a 5 point Likert scale. The reliability and validity of the instruments were determined by means of Cronbach alpha and this was found to be reliable for teachers' (0.72) and for the students' questionnaire (0.75). The second method to obtain reliability was through experts' opinion. The sample of the study was randomly selected both for teachers and students of 9th and 10th grade from the Federal schools of Bahawalpur, Multan and Lahore region and this consisted of 720 respondents, of whom 360 were teachers and 360 were students. The data was analysed by two ways, i.e., first mean score and measure of dispersion (standard deviation) were calculated and then an independent sample t-test was applied to assess the difference in views between the two groups.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2015-11-10

How to Cite

Dr. Muhammad Ramzan, Shahida Jalal, & Nasreen Akhtar. (2015). Problems of End Users Associated With Curriculum Change. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends and Practices, 5(2), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2015/v5/i2/1488

Issue

Section

Articles

References

Borman, G. D., & Kimball, S.M. (2005). Teacher quality and educational quality: do teachers with higher standards based evaluation rating close students achievements gap? The Elementary School Journal, 106(1), 23-37.

Bukhari, M. A. (2002). Curriculum and instruction. Islamabad: Allama Iqbal Open University.

Ellis, A.K. (2004). Exemplars of curriculum theory. New York: Eye on Education.

Farooq, R. A. (1993). A survey study of teacher training in Pakistan. Islamabad: Academy of Educational Planning and Management, Ministry of Education.

Government of Pakistan. (2000). Mathematics curriculum 2000 for classes K12 and I-V. Islamabad: Curriculum Wing, Ministry of Education.

Hall, G., & Hord, S. (2011). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Kerr, J.F. (1968). Changing the curriculum London: University of London press.

McNeil, D. J. (2006). Contemporary Curriculum in Thought and Action (6th ed.). India: Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication data.

Moyle, K. (2007). How can the value of educational technologies in schools be measured. Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Vancouver, Canada.

Oliva, P. F. (2009). Developing the curriculum (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Robert, Z. (1976). Curriculum: Principles and foundations. New York: Harper & Row.

Sheldon, L.E. (1988). Evaluating English language teaching textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42(4), 237-246.

Siddique, S. A. (1990). Teacher Education in Pakistan. National Training Workshop on Educational Planning and Management for Principals of Teachers Training Institutions, AEPAM, Islamabad, Pakistan, Ministry of Education.

Tanner, D., & Tanner, L. (1980). Curriculum development: Theory into practice. New York: Macmillan.

Zafar, M. (2003). Fiscal (Economic) devolution in education. Case study reflecting initial responses. Islamabad: Ministry of Education, Pakistan.