Practices of Teachers' in Implementing Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluationan Exploratory Study

Authors

  • Vanita Chopra Gargi College, Delhi University
  • Ranjana Bhatia Amity Institute of Education, Saket

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2014/v4/i1/1480

Keywords:

Classroom Practices, Formative Assessment, Continuous Comprehensive Evaluation, CBSE.

Abstract

The present study reports on the practices adopted by the secondary school teachers of English in implementing the Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE) scheme of the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE), India which has to be implemented as part of its national assessment policy. The study is delimited to observing the formative assessment practices adopted by the English teachers in enhancing the four language skills along with using variety of tools and techniques as directed by Central Board of Secondary Education in the Teacher's Manual. This study was conducted on a group of twenty teachers chosen purposively from twenty schools (ten central government and ten private). The major findings reveal that almost all teachers use multiple activities for assessing the listening, speaking and writing skills of the students. Reading still remains a neglected skill in the classroom owing to lack of awareness among teachers to use innovative strategies for enabling them to enhance their reading habit with comprehension. In addition, teachers also make use of multiple criteria to assess the above skills along with assessing sub-skills for the same. It was also found that teachers use multiple forms of record maintenance and assessment for assessing the gifted students in the class. With regard to remediation and enrichment for the students less than 50% of the teachers' prefer not to use multiple strategies for remediation and enrichment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2014-05-10

How to Cite

Chopra, V., & Bhatia, R. (2014). Practices of Teachers’ in Implementing Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluationan Exploratory Study. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends and Practices, 4(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2014/v4/i1/1480

Issue

Section

Articles

References

Hartog Commission. (1929). CCE manual for teachers class IXth and Xth revised edition. New Delhi: Central Board of Secondary Education.

Kothari Education Commission. (1966). Education and national development. New Delhi: Ministry of Education and Youth Services.

Latika, K., & Mishra. (2012, March). Implementation of continuous and comprehensive evaluation at elementary stage of education: a case study of selected schools of Koraput district. Paper presented at the National Conference on Recent Trends in Assessment at School Stage at Department of Educational Measurement and Evaluation (DEME), NCERT.

Manjula, P.R. (2001). Effectiveness of the continuous and comprehensive evaluation training programme over the evaluation practices of primary school teachers. A DPEP research study in Tamil Nadu. Mysore: Regional Institute of Education.

Manjula, P.R., & Kulkarni, S.P. (2002). Development and Implementation of a school based evaluation system at primary stage in demonstration school. Mysore: Regional Institute of Education.

National Policy of Education (1986). New Delhi: MHRD, Government of India.

Padmanabhan, T. (2008). Examinations never disclose anything of vital significance. Edutracks, 7(8), 8-12.

Pal, G.C., & Singhal, S. (2002). Coping with examination distress. Indian Educational Review, 38(1), 139-149.

Panda, B.N. (2012, March). Status of continuous and comprehensive evaluation at elementary stage: An analysis. Paper presented in National Conference on Recent Trends in Assessment at School Stage at Department of Educational Measurement and Evaluation (DEME), NCERT.

Prakash, V., & Bhalla, M.K. (1996). Examination reforms: impediments and breakthrough. Journal of Indian Education, 15-21.

Rajput, S. et. al. (2003). Concept of continuous and comprehensive evaluation: teacher's handbook for primary stage. New Delhi: NCERT.

Ramadas, V., & Divya, T. (2007). Grading in schools: Knowledge, attitude and practices of elementary teachers. Edutracks, 6(11), 17-21.

Secondary Education Commission. (1952-53). Report of Secondary Education Commission. New Delhi: Ministry of Education and Youth Services.

University Education Commission. (1948). CCE manual for teachers class IX & X revised edition. New Delhi: Central Board of Secondary Education.