Attitude of Teacher Trainees Towards Learning Through Powerpoint: A Case Study

Authors

  • Mool Raj Sharma MIER College of Education (Autonomous), Jammu
  • Kawal Preet Kour MIER College of Education (Autonomous), Jammu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2017/v7/i1/1449

Keywords:

PowerPoint, Attitudes, Teacher Trainees.

Abstract

Educational technology and its use in Education are increasing day by day. It has completely changed our mode of teaching and learning. Use of computer assisted teaching, audio visual aids, PowerPoint presentations etc. have found their place in every institution of the world. Most of the teachers believe that use of Power Point in the teacher training colleges has made the teaching-learning process more interactive and dynamic. This paper is based upon a study conducted to know the attitudes of teacher trainees towards PowerPoint presentations and its use in a teaching -learning context. A questionnaire on attitude towards Power Point was prepared by the investigators and administered to a sample of 200 teacher trainees in Jammu. It was found that teaching through PowerPoint enabled classrooms to be interesting and motivating for both teachers and learners. However, no significant differences were found to exist between scores obtained on attitudes towards PowerPoint on the basis of gender, residential background, computer training and teaching subjects respectively. Nevertheless, teacher trainees exhibited favourable and positive attitude towards the use of PowerPoint for teaching at the B.Ed. level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2017-05-10

How to Cite

Mool Raj Sharma, & Kawal Preet Kour. (2017). Attitude of Teacher Trainees Towards Learning Through Powerpoint: A Case Study. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends and Practices, 7(1), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2017/v7/i1/1449

Issue

Section

Articles

References

Anastasi, C. (1957). Attitude of in-service and pre-service primary school teachers. Journal of Education Psychology, 36(3), 1-5.

Annetta, L.A., Slykhuis D., & Wiebe, E. (2007). Evaluating gender differences of attitudes and perceptions toward PowerPointTm for pre-service science teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(4), 297-304.

Bartsch, R. A., & Cobern, K. M. (2003). Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in lectures. Computers & Education, 4 (1), 77–86.

Best, J.W. (2003). Research in Education.New Delhi : Prentice Hall of India, Pvt. Ltd.

Bitter, G., & Pierson, M. (2002). Using technology in the classroom (5th Ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Chandra, S., Yadav, N., & Banik, K. (2014). Conventional teaching versus power point presentation: a comparative study for undergraduate organic chemistry students. Chemistry: Bulgarian Journal of Science Education, 23(4), 45-54.

Dash, M.K. (2007). Integration of ICT in teaching and learning: A challenge. Edutrack, 6 (12), 11-13.

Derebssa, D. (2006). Tension between traditional and modern teaching-learning approaches in Ethiopian primary schools. Journal of International Cooperation in Education, 9(1), 12-18.

Gnanamuthu, S. J., & Krishankumar, R. (2009). A tool to measure the teacher trainee attitude towards ICT. Journal on School Educational Technology, 5(2), 39-45.

Jayasubramanian, P., Ramya, N., & Rohini, M. (2015). A study on information, communication technologies learning practices in educational institutions in Coimbatore. International Journal of Applied Research, 1(8), 480-485.

Merchant, G. J. (1992). Attitudes towards research based effective teaching behaviours. Journal of International Psychology, 19(2), 7-16.

Nouri, H.(2005). The effect of Power Point presentations on student learning and attitudes. Global Perspectives on Accounting Education, 2, 53-73.

Vamshi, K. T., Datta, M.V., Kishan, Y.S.S., Aditya, V., & Bhanuprakash, G. (2011). Comparative study on the teaching effectiveness of chalk and talk and Microsoft PowerPoint presentation from the student perspective. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 4(1), 45-50.