Evaluation of Aspects Which Support the Practice of Teaching for Students

Authors

  • Dede Nuraida University of PGRI Ronggolawe Tuban Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2018/v8/i2/1397

Keywords:

Microteaching, Simulation, Teaching Practice, Teaching and Learning Strategies.

Abstract

Teaching practice is a compulsory component for students in the Department of Biology Education. Courses that support the implementation of this teaching practice are a)Microteaching (MT), b)Teaching and Learning Strategies (TLS) and c)Development of Biology Teaching Program (DBTB). In the implementation of teaching practices, every student is mentored by a lecturer (LM) and a teacher (TM). Prior to the implementation of teaching practice in schools, the opportunity is given to the students to perform simulations on campus. This study aimed to determine how effectively the above aspects support the implementation of the teaching practice as well as how the depth of material that has been given supports the practice of teaching and the role of teaching practice in providing teaching experience for students. This research was a descriptive study that involved 77 students. Data were collected using a questionnaire, the responses to which were analysed by a quantitative descriptive technique. Results showed that more than 75% students’ responses either strongly supported or supported the aspects MT, TLS, DBTB, TM and LM respectively. Similar levels of support were given for the depth of the material aspect and the role of teaching practice in providing teaching experience for students. However, the simulation implementation aspect was strongly supported or supported by less than 55% students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2018-11-10

How to Cite

Dede Nuraida. (2018). Evaluation of Aspects Which Support the Practice of Teaching for Students. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends and Practices, 8(2), 180–189. https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2018/v8/i2/1397

Issue

Section

Articles

References

Ahmadi, A. (2012). Improving the Ability of Teachers in Developing Innovative Learning Tools through Lesson Study. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Biology, 9(1), 257-262. Surakarta, Indonesia: Biology Education Study Program FKIP Sebelas Maret University.

Anwar, Y., Nuryani, Y. R., Ari, W., & Sri, R. (2013). Profile of Pedagogical Content Knowledge Ability of Senior Biology Teachers and Junior Biology Teachers.

Proceedings of the National Seminar on Research, Education and Implementation, MIPA, B-161-B-165.

Cochran, K. F. (1997). Pedagogical content knowledge: Teachers' integration of subject matter, pedagogy, students, and learning environments. Research Matters - to the Science Teacher, No 9702.

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.

Palmer, D. H. (2009). Student interest generated during an inquiry skill lesson. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 147-165.

Prasetyo, F. I., Slamet, S., & Puguh, K. (2012). Pengaruh Penerapan Quantum Learning terhadap Hasil Belajar Biologi Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 4 Surakarta Tahun Pelajaran 2011/2012. Prosiding Seminar Nasional IX.

Biologi, Sains, Lingkungan, dan Pembelajarannya dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Daya Saing Bangsa, 63-69.

Priyayi, D. F., Slamet, S., & Riezky, M. P. (2012). Pengaruh Penerapan AL terhdap Hasil Belajar Biologi Siswa Kelas XI SMAN 1 Boyolali Tahun Pelajaran 2011/2012. Prosiding Seminar Nasional IX. Biologi, Sains, Lingkungan, dan Pembelajarannya dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Daya Saing Bangsa, 70-75.

Schonborn, K. J., & Bogeholz, S. (2009). Knowledge transfer in biology & translation across external representations: Experts views and challenges for learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 931-955.

Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Acher, A., Fortus, D., Schwarz, Y., Hug, B., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accesible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632-654.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.

Sudarisman, S. (2012). Kesiapan mahasiswa calon guru biologi terhadap kegiatan program pengalaman lapangan (PPL). Makalah disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional IX. Biologi, Sains, Lingkungan, dan Pembelajarannya dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Daya Saing Bangsa. Surakarta, 07 Juli.

Susantini, E., Abdul, K., Bertha, Y., An Nuri, M., & Ulfi, F. (2014). Development microteaching handbook for lecturer, student, and learning laboratory crew of science and mathematics faculty. Macrothink Institute International Journal of Education, 6(3), 229-236.

Tenzer, A. (2011). Praktik pengalaman lapangan berbasis lesson study: Pelaksanaan dan manfaatnya bagi mahasiswa calon guru biologi. Jurnal PendidikanBiologi,2(2),141-148.