Improving Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Institutions: Is Discussion Method Theanswer?

Authors

  • Isaac Kofi Biney SCDE, College of Education University of Ghana, Legon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2018/v8/i2/1396

Keywords:

Discussion Method, Higher Education Institutions, Democratic Classrooms, Inclusiveness, Participatory and Empowering.

Abstract

This paper explores the role of discussion method in teaching for improving learning in higher education institutions. Teaching and learning are inseparable. However, teaching becomes effective only when it leads to meaningful learning. The lecture method for teaching dominates the classrooms in higher education institutions and is receiving negative comments from all stakeholders. Discussion method is considered superior by experts as it is more democratic by nature. It is inclusive, participatory and holds the key for empowering learners to be critical thinkers. A descriptive narrative design was employed for conducting the study. Qualitative techniques were employed at several stages throughout the study. Purposive and accidental sampling procedures were used. Semi-structured interviews guide were used for collecting data and ideas from the participants. It emerged that discussion method for teaching in classrooms possesses the power to stimulate quiet and shy-looking learners open up, think, participate and follow the instructions offered during discussions in the classrooms. It is recommended that the discussion method for teaching be employed because it creates an equal playing field for students to think critically and contribute to lessons.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2018-11-10

How to Cite

Isaac Kofi Biney. (2018). Improving Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Institutions: Is Discussion Method Theanswer?. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends and Practices, 8(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2018/v8/i2/1396

Issue

Section

Articles

References

Brookfield, S. D. (2004). Discussion. In M. W. Galbraith (2004) (Ed.). Adult learning methods: A Guide for Effective Instruction. Malabar, Florida: Krieger Publishing Company.

Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Chilisa, B. (2012). Indigenous research methodologies. London: SAGE.

Chilisa, B., & Preece, J. (2005). Research methods for adult educators in Africa. Cape Town:Pearson Education South Africa.

Christensen, C. R. (1991). Discussion teacher in action: Questioning, listening, and response. In C. R. Christensen, D. A Garvin and A. Sweet (Eds.), Education for judgment: The artistry of discussion leadership. Boston: Harvard Business School.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA; Sage Publications, Inc.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative qualitative research. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Davis, J. R. (1993). Better teaching, more learning. Phoenix, AZ: The American Council on Education and The Oryx Press.

Evers, F. T., Rush, J. C., & Berdrow, I. (1998). The bases of competence: Skills for lifelong learning and employability. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Government of Ghana (2018). Number of accredited tertiary institutions in Ghana. Retrieved on 4th September, 2018 from: http://nab.gov.gh/news1/414-accredited-published-tertiaryInstitutions -as-at-august-2016-summary.

Gowin, D. B., & Alvarez, M. C. (2005). The art of educating with V diagrams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Imel, S. (1997). Adult learning in groups. Review of Educational Research, 52(3), 421-445.

D.,& Kimble, H. (1954). Adult education in a changing Africa. Seminar Report, Department of Extra-mural Studies, University College of Gold Coast, December 10-23, p. 30.

Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research. (5th ed.). London: SAGE Publications.

Meyers, C. (1986). Teaching students to think critically: A guide for faculty in all disciplines.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Parkay, F. W. (2013). Becoming a teacher. (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Rogers, C. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Small, M. (2009). Good questions: Great ways to differentiate mathematics instruction. NewYork, NY: Teachers College Press.

Wassermann, S. (2010). Effective classroom discussions. In meeting students where they are. ASCD Express, February 2010, 67(5). Alexandria, VA.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).

Welty, W. M. (1989). Discussion method teaching: A practical guide. Lincoln: University of Nebraska.