Perceived Parenting and Perceived Teaching Styles in Relation to Social Maturity of Adolescents

Authors

  • Sandeep Kaur Research Scholar, Department of Education, Panjab University, Chandigarh
  • Kanwalpreet Kaur Assistant Professor, Institute of Educational Technology and Vocational Education Panjab University, Chandigarh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2020/v10/i1/1353

Keywords:

Perceived Parenting Styles, Perceived Teaching Styles, Social Maturity, Adolescents, School Students.

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the relationship between perceived parenting and perceived teaching styles on social maturity of adolescents. Random sampling technique was used to select the sample which comprised 479 school students of the Union Territory of Chandigarh. The tools used in this study were a) Parenting Style Scale by Bharadwaj, Sharma and Garg (1995), b) Perceived Teaching Styles Scale by the Investigator (2017) and c) Rao's Social Maturity Scale (2011). The results show that the favourable perceived parenting styles with perceived student-centred teaching style yielded higher mean scores of social maturity of adolescents as compared to low favourable perceived parenting styles with teacher-centred perceived teaching style.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2020-05-01

How to Cite

Sandeep Kaur, & Kanwalpreet Kaur. (2020). Perceived Parenting and Perceived Teaching Styles in Relation to Social Maturity of Adolescents. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends and Practices, 10(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2020/v10/i1/1353

Issue

Volume 10, Issue 1, May 2020

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Sandeep Kaur, Kanwalpreet Kaur

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The articles published in the MIER Journal of Educational Studies, Trends and Practics (MJESTP) are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

  • Copyright on any open access article in the MIER Journal of Educational Studies, Trends and Practics (MJESTP) published by Model Institute of Education and Research (MIER) is retained by the author(s).
  • Author(s) grant MIER a license to publish the article and identify himself/herself/themselves as the original publisher.
  • Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
  • The Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 formalizes these and other terms and conditions of publishing articles.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Bala, J., & Bakshi, R. (2017). Self-efficacy and social maturity of higher secondary school students in relation to their gender and type of school. International Journal of Applied Research, 3(7), 812-815.

Bhardwaj, R. L., Sharma, H., & Garg, A. (1998). Manual for parenting scale. Agra: Pankaj Mapun.

Bhargava, M., & Sidhu, R. (2000). Personality characteristics of parentally accepted and rejected children, parental behaviour. Kach Ghat, Agra: Bhargava Book House.

Brekelmans, M., Sleegers, P., & Fraser, B. (2000). Teaching for active learning. New learning, pp. 227-242. Dordrecht, NL: Springer.

Chang, Y. (2010). Students' Perceptions of Teaching Styles and Use of Learning Strategies. Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, Retrieved from http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/782.

Douglas, A. B. (2011) Do parenting styles mirror teaching styles? Retrieved from https://www.psychologicalscience.org/.

Getzels, J. W., & Thelen, H. A. (1960). The classroom group as a unique social system. In Henry, N. (Ed.), The dynamics of instructional groups. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.

Grasha, A. F. (1996). Teaching with style. Pittsburgh, PA: Alliance Publishers.

Hill, J. P. (1987). Research on adolescents and their families: Past and prospect. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 37, 13-31.

Lin, H. (1995). Influences of parenting and teaching styles on young children's pro social and antisocial development in Taiwan (Unpublished doctorate dissertation). Arizona State University. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (9606203).

McNeil, J. D., & Popham, W. J. (1973). The assessment of teacher competence. In R. M. W. Travers (ed.), Second handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/ 20157481.pdf.

Quinonez, N. (2014).Different teaching styles and how they affect your students. Retrieved from https://blog.udemy.com/teaching-styles/.

Petito, R., & Cummins, R. A. (2012). Quality of life in adolescence: The role of perceived control, parenting style and social support. Behaviour Change, 17(3), 196-207.

Rao, N. (2011). Social Maturity Scale. Manual for Rao's Social Maturity Scale, Agra: National Psychological Corporation.

Walberg, H. J. (1972). Social environment and individual learning: A test of the Bloom model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 69–73.

Winne, P. H., & Marx, R. W. (1977). Re-conceptualizing research on teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 668–678.

Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (1998). The teacher factor in the social climate of the classroom. In B. J. Fraser, & K. G. Tobin, (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 565?80). London, UK: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Wubbels, T., & Levy, J. (1993). Do you know what you look like? London: The Falmer Press.

Xia, X. (2016). Parenting styles, parental involvement and kindergarten children's readiness for elementary school in Shanghai China (Unpublished doctorate dissertation). University of the Pacific. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (3746277).

Zimmerman, R. S., Khoury, E. L., Vega, W. A., Gil, A. G., & Warheit, G. J. (1995). Teacher and parent perceptions of behavior problems among a sample of African American, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic white students. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(2), 181-197.