THE FUTURE OF TEACHER EDUCATION: REFLECTIONS ON AN INNOVATION

Authors

  • David Lynch Professor, School of Education, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, Australia
  • Richard Smith MIER

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2011/v1/i2/1619

Keywords:

Teaching, Teacher Education, Education Reform, Partnerships, Learning Management.

Abstract

This article is about teacher education reform. At the time of writing, teacher education (which is predominately the domain of universities in Australia), has undergone numerous critical reviews with little change effect. The teaching profession's struggles to cope with a changing world has been documented and an increasing push from Australian governments, at both the state and federal level for improved school outcomes are regular pieces in the national Australian press. A cadre of teacher education commentators call for a rethink on teacher education. This article showcases a disruptive model in teacher education and answers some of the ponderings around what teacher education could be and how it could be organised differently for the different world in which teachers now have to operate. More specifically, the article examines the Bachelor of Learning Management (BLM) which was developed at CentralQueenslandUniversityin2000andisstillinoperationtoday. TheBLMwas the first major revision and redevelopment of teacher education in Australia in twenty five years: this fact alone makes the BLM an interesting case study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2011-11-10

How to Cite

David Lynch, & Richard Smith. (2011). THE FUTURE OF TEACHER EDUCATION: REFLECTIONS ON AN INNOVATION. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends and Practices, 1(2), 130–148. https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2011/v1/i2/1619

Issue

Section

Articles

References

Allen, J. (2008). The theory-practice gap: turning theory into practice in a preservice teacher education programme. Unpublished PhD thesis, Central Queensland University.

Awazu, Y., Baloh, P., Desouza, K. C., Wecht, C., Kim, J., & Jha, S. (2009). Information-communication technologies open up innovation. Research-Technology-Management, 52(1) 51-58.

Bauman, Z. (1997). Universities: old, new and different. In Anthony Smith and Frank Webster (Eds.) The postmodern university? Contested visions of higher education in society. (pp. 18-26). Buckingham: Society For Research into Higher Education & Open University press.

Cochran-Smith, M. (2006). Introduction To The Double Issue: Evidence, Efficacy, and Effectiveness. Journal of Teacher Education, 57: 1, January/February, pp. 3-5.

Committee for the Review of Teaching and Teacher Education, Australia's Teachers: Australia's Future, Advancing Innovation, Science, Technology and Mathematics – Main Report, Department of Education, Science and Training, Canberra, 2003.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: a review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Retrieved from

Education Queensland (2000). 2010 Queensland education. Brisbane, Qld: Office of Strategic Planning and Portfolio Services.

Fletcher, A. (2001). The art of looking sideways. New York: Phaidon.

Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in a Knowledge Society, Macgraw Hill Education: Berkshire, England.

Ingvarson, L., Beavis, A., Danielson, C., Ellis, L., & Elliott, A. (2005). An evaluation of the bachelor of learning management at Central Queensland University (Final report). Melbourne: Australian council for educational research.

Lynch, D. (2004). A comparison of the BLM and the BEd programmes in the context of a knowledge economy. Unpublished Doctor of Education thesis. Central Queensland University.

Manigart, S., Lockett, A., Meuleman, M., Wright, M., Landström, H., Bruining, H., Desbrières, P., & Hommel, U. (2002). Why do European venture capital companies syndicate? Retrieved from Marzano, R. J., Gaddy, B. B., & Dean, C. (2000). What works in classroom instruction. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.

(2004).

Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2003). Introduction 'Mode 2' revisited: the new production of knowledge. Minerva, 41 179–194.

OECD (2002). Understanding the brain: towards a new learning science. Paris: Directorate for Education.

Reich, R. B. (1991). The Work of Nations. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). What is instructional-design theory and how is it changing? In Instructional design theories and models, (Volume II). a new paradigm of instructional theory. Mahwah, NJ: London, Lawrence Erlbaum, (pp. 5-29).

Sachs, J., & Groundwater-Smith, S. (2006). The changing landscape of teacher education in Australia, in Teaching and Teacher Education. Volume 15, Issue 2. (pp. 215-227)

Shulman, L. S. (1986a). Paradigms and research programmes for the study of teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.). Handbook of research and teaching. New York: Macmillan (pp. 3-36).

Shulman, L. S. (1986b). Those who understand knowledge: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2) 4-12.

Skilbeck, M., & Connell, H. (2005). Submission to the Standing Committee on Education and Vocational Training Inquiry into Teacher Education.

Smith, R. (2000). The future of teacher education: principles and prospects. South Pacific Journal of Teacher Education. 28(1) 7 – 28.

Smith, R., & Lynch, D. (2010). Rethinking teacher education: teacher education in a knowledge age. Sydney: AACLM Press.

Smith, R., Lynch, D., & Mienczakowski, J. (2003). The bachelor of learning management (BLM) and education capability: why we do not prepare 'teachers' anymore. Change: Transformation in Education. 6(2) 23-37.

Standing Committee on Education and Vocational Training tabled its report on the inquiry into Teacher Education entitled Top of the Class. (2007).

Wagner, S. M. (2009). Research Report: Getting innovation from suppliers. Research-Technology-Management, 52(1), 8-9.

Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Agran, M., Mithaug, D. E., & Martin, J. E. (2000). Promoting causal agency: the self-determined learning model of instruction. Exceptional Children. 66(4) 439-453.