LEADERSHIP APPROACH IN RELATION TO LEVEL OF CONSCIOUSNESS: A CORRELATIONAL ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Vaibhav Chauhan Research Scholar, Faculty of Education, Dayalbagh Educational Institute. Agra (U.P.)
  • Sadhna Sharma Research Scholar, Faculty of Education, Dayalbagh Educational Institute. Agra (U.P.)
  • Nandita Satsangee Professor, Dept. of Foundations of Education, Faculty of Education, Dayalbagh Educational Institute. Agra (U.P.)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2013/v3/i2/1550

Keywords:

Leadership Approach, Consciousness, Transformational Leadership.

Abstract

The present empirical study was designed to explore the relationship between the leadership approach of teacher trainees and their level of consciousness. A descriptive survey was conducted on 100 teacher trainees (both male & female in the ratio of 1:1). The level of consciousness of teacher trainees was assessed using Consciousness Quotient Inventory (CQ-i) by Brazdau (2011). To assess the leadership approach Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ-6S) by Bass and Avolio (1992) was used. The relationship between scores on seven leadership factors (comprising three leadership approaches) and the level of consciousness was studied using Pearson's product moment correlation. Results indicate a significant positive correlation to a varying degree between consciousness and three leadership approaches .

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2013-11-10

How to Cite

Vaibhav Chauhan, Sadhna Sharma, & Nandita Satsangee. (2013). LEADERSHIP APPROACH IN RELATION TO LEVEL OF CONSCIOUSNESS: A CORRELATIONAL ANALYSIS. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends and Practices, 3(2), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2013/v3/i2/1550

Issue

Volume 3, Issue 2, November 2013

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Vaibhav Chauhan, Sadhna Sharma, Nandita Satsangee

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The articles published in the MIER Journal of Educational Studies, Trends and Practics (MJESTP) are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

  • Copyright on any open access article in the MIER Journal of Educational Studies, Trends and Practics (MJESTP) published by Model Institute of Education and Research (MIER) is retained by the author(s).
  • Author(s) grant MIER a license to publish the article and identify himself/herself/themselves as the original publisher.
  • Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
  • The Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 formalizes these and other terms and conditions of publishing articles.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Baars, B.J. (1997). In the theatre of Consciousness: The workspace of mind. Retrieved from http://bernardbaars.pbworks.com/f/Baars%20Theater% 20book%20Ch%201-2.pdf. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195102659.001.1

Baars, B.J. (2003). Introduction: Treating Consciousness as a variable: The fading taboo. Retrieved from http://www.upaya.org/ uploads/pdfs /Baars2003.pdf.

Bass, B., & Avolio, B. (1992). Transformational Leadership. In Leadership, (pp. 131159). Retrieved from http://kcxt.cdu.edu.cn /eol/common/ fckeditor /openfile.jsp?id=.

Bass, B.M. (1999). Two decades of Research and development in Transformational Leadership. Retrieved from http://www.techtied.net/wp-content/ uploads/2007/10/bass_transforrmational_leadership. pdf.

Beer, P.D (n.d.). Conscious leader as a key factor of sustainability. Retrieved from http://www.villageofleaders.co.za/conscious-leadership-a-keyfactorof-sustainability-by-paul-de-beer/.

Brazdau, O., & Mihai, C. (2011). The Consciousness quotient: a new predictor of students academic performance. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, 11, 245-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.01.070

Brazdau, O. (2013). What is CQ? Retrieved from http://www.consciousnessquotient.com/what-is-cq.

Burns, J.M. (1978).Transformational Leadership Theory. Retrieved from http://www.leadership-central.com/burns-transformationalleadershiptheory.html#axzz 2Naz97Re4.

Carter, H. (2009). What do we mean by conscious leadership? Retrieved from http://neelabettridge.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/cclmodelexecsummary 12-august-09.pdf.

Cherry, K. (2012). What is transactional Leadership? Retrieved from http:// psychology.about.com/od/leadership/f/transactionalleadership.htm.

Heaton, D.P., & Harung, H.S. (1999) "The Conscious Organization". The Learning Organization, 6(4), 157-163. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com /journals.htm?articleid=882576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09696479910280604

Hayden, G., & Jager, K.D. (2010). Demystifying the consciousness quotient. Retrieved from http://www.sphereconsulting.org/newtrends/ Demystifying%20the%20 Consciousness % 20Quotient.pdf.

Horn-Turpin, F.D. (2009). A Study Examining the Effects of Transformational Leadership Behaviours on the Factors of Teaching Efficacy, Job Satisfaction and Organizational commitment as Perceived by Special Education Teachers. Retrieved from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-02152009-080918/unrestricted/FDHornTurpinETD09.pdf.

Koh, W.L., Steers, R.M., & Terberg, J.R. (2006). The effects of transactional leadership on teacher attitudes and student performance in Singapore. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi /10.1002/job.4030160404/abstract.

Mourshed, M., & Barber, M. (2010). How the world's most improved school systems keep getting better. Retrieved fromwww.mckinsey.com/client_service/social_sector/latest_thinking/worlds_most_impr oved_schools. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2011-2-5-122

Muenjohan, N. (2007). Transformational Leadership: A new force in leadership research. Retrieved from http://www.wbiconpro.com/436Nuttawuth.pdf.

Murphy. (2005). Connecting teacher leadership and school improvement. The Educational Forum, 68, 276-286. Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Riaz, O. (2012). Spirituality & Transformational Leadership in Education. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1763&context=etd.

Ross, J.A., & Gray, P. (2006). School Leadership and Student Achievement: The Mediating Effects of Teacher Beliefs. Canadian Journal of Education, 29 (3), 798-822. Retrieved from http://www.cssescee.ca/CJE/Articles/FullText /CJE29-3/CJE29-3Ross%26Gray.pdf. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20054196

Velman, M. (2009). How to define consciousness and how not to define consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16(5), 139-156.