SELF-CONCEPT, ATTITUDE AND PERCEPTION OF USEFULNESS OF PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY ACCORDING TO TYPE AND LOCATION OF SCHOOLS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2013/v3/i2/1548Keywords:
Self-Concept, Attitude, Perception, Physics, Chemistry.Abstract
This study was an attempt to test if students differed in their self-concept, attitude and their perception of the usefulness of Physics and Chemistry in terms of their type of school and location. To test this hypothesis, t-test was used to compare differences in the mean scores in terms of type of school and location. Pearson's Product Moment Correlation coefficient was used to determine the relationships between independent and dependent variable. Four hundred and forty six (446) students constituted the sample. The attitude towards Physics and Chemistry and the perception of the type of school showed there was no significant difference between single-sex and co- educational school. There was no significant difference between single- sex and co- educational school (mixed) students in their self- concept in Physics and Chemistry. There was no significant difference between single- sex and co- educational school (mixed) students in their perception of the usefulness of Physics and Chemistry. Results also show that urban students have better perception of the usefulness of Physics and Chemistry than the rural students. The difference in perception of the usefulness of Chemistry is statistically significant but the difference in perception of the usefulnessofPhysicsisnotstatisticallysignificant. Bothruralandurbanstudentshad positive attitude and self-concept for Physics and Chemistry.Downloads
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Inzahuli Samuel Majere, Elizabeth Role, Lazarus Ndiku Makewa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles published in the MIER Journal of Educational Studies, Trends and Practics (MJESTP) are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
- Copyright on any open access article in the MIER Journal of Educational Studies, Trends and Practics (MJESTP) published by Model Institute of Education and Research (MIER) is retained by the author(s).
- Author(s) grant MIER a license to publish the article and identify himself/herself/themselves as the original publisher.
- Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
- The Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 formalizes these and other terms and conditions of publishing articles.
References
Ahmad, I. (1986). Initial Development and Validation of Academic SelfConcept. Published Report. National Institute of Psychology, QuaideAzam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Arnold, M. L., Newman, J. H., Gaddy, B. B., & Dean, C. B. (2005, April 27). A look at the condition of rural education research: Setting a direction for future research. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 20 (6).
Best, W. J. (1991). Research in education. U.S.A.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Cobb, R. A., McIntire, W. G., & Pratt, P. A. (1989). Vocational and educational aspirations of high school students: A problem for rural America. Research in Rural Education, 6(2), 11-23.
Constantine, M. G., & Blackmon, S. M. (2002). Black adolescents' racial socialization experiences: Their relations to home, school and peer self-esteem. Journal of Black Studies, 32(3), 322-335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002193470203200303
Education Alliance. (2004). Closing the achievement gap: A focus on rural schools. Charleston, WV:Author. Retrieved from http://www.educationalalliance.org.
Eider, G. H. (1963). Achievement orientations and career patterns of rural youth. Sociology of Education, 37(1), 30-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2112139
Everett, A.V. (1991). The self concept of high, medium and low achievers. The Australia Journal of Education, 15(3), 319-324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000494417101500309
Fan, X., & Chen, M. J. (1999). Academic achievement of rural school students: A multi- year comparison with their peers in suburban and urban schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 15, 31-46.
Felder, R.M., Felder, G.N., Mauney, M., Hamrin, C.E., & Dietz, E.J. (1995) Differences between rural and urban backgrounds. Journal of Engineering Education,84, 151-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1995.tb00162.x
Girls' Poor grades in science worry Lucy. (2004, April) Biosafety News: Africa's Monthly Science Newspaper, 51, 1 - 2.
Greenberg, E. J., & Teixeira, R. A. (1995). Non-metro student achievement on par with metro. Rural Development Perspectives, 10, 17-23.
Haas, T. (1992). What can I become: Educational aspirations of students in rural America (No. ED 345 931). ERIC Digest.
Haller, E. J., & Virkler, S. J. (1993). Another look at rural-non-rural differences in students' educational aspirations. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 9(3), 170-178.
Haque, A., & Sarwat, K. (1998). Age, gender, and achievement effects on academic self-concept of high school children. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 13, 35-42.
Hektner, J. (1995). When moving up implies moving out: Rural adolescent conflict in the transition to adulthood. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 11(1), 3-14.
Hu, S. (2003). Educational aspirations and postsecondary access and choice: Students in urban, suburban, and rural schools compared. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(14). DOI: https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v11n14.2003
Israel, G. D., Beaulieu, L. J., & Hartless, G. (2001). The influence of family and community social capital on educational achievement. Rural Sociology, 66, 43-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2001.tb00054.x
Kampits, E. I. (1996). Rural partnerships in New England: Learning from kids. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 12(3), 171-177.
Kannapel, P. J., & DeYoung, A. J. (1999). The rural school problem in 1999: A review and critique of the literature. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 15(2), 67-79.
Khattri, N., Riley, K. W., & Kane, M. B. (1997). Students at risk in poor, rural areas: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 13(2), 79-100.
Kelly, A. & Smail, B.(1986). Sex stereotypes and attitudes to science among eleven-year old children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 56 (2), 158-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1986.tb02657.x
Ley, J., Nelson, S., & Beltyukova, S. (1996). Congruence of aspirations of rural youth with expectations held by parents and school staff. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 12(3), 133-141.
Madaus, G. F., Kellaghan, T., Rakow, E. A., & King, D. J. (1979). The sensitivity measures of school effectiveness. Harvard Educational Review, 49( 2), 207–225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.49.2.1533110q23j83566
Marland, M. (Ed.) (1983). Sex differentiation and schooling.London: Heinemann.
Marsh, H. W., & Shavelson, R. (1985). Self-concept: It's Multifaceted, Hierarchical Structure. Educational Psychologist, 20, 107-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2003_1
Marsh, H. W. (1989). Age and sex effects in multiple dimensions of selfconcept: preadolescence to early-adulthood. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 417-430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.417
Miller, R. B., & Brickman, S. J. (2004). A model of future-oriented motivation and self-regulation. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 9-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000012343.96370.39
Ormerod, M. B. (1983). A model to exhibit the independence of the cognitive and affective domain of objectives for the use in science and technical teacher training. Research in Science and Technological Education. 1(1), 119 –128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514830010113
Ormrod, J. E. (2000). Educational Psychology: Developing Learners. PrenticeHall, Inc, New Jersey,USA, 80-83.
Purkey, W. W. (1970). Self-concept and Academic Achievement. Englewood Cliffs, Printice-Hall. New Jersey, USA.
Otiende, J. E., & Njoroge, G. K. (2001). Education, Gender and Democracy in Kenya. Nairobi: Quest and Insight Publishers.
Reeves, E. B., & Bylund, R. A. (2005). Are rural schools inferior to urban schools? A multilevel analysis of school accountability trends in Kentucky. Rural Sociology, 70, 360-386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1526/0036011054831215
Reyes, L. H. (1984). Affective variables and mathematics education. Elementary School Journal, 84, 558 –581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/461384
Role, E. M. (1995). Effects of values integration on college students' cognitive and affective learning's in mathematics. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of the Philippines, Quezon City.
Roscigno, V. J., & Crowley, M. L. (2001). Rurality, institutional disadvantage, and achievement/attainment. Rural Sociology, 66, 268-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2001.tb00067.x
Sabir, F. (1999). Academic Self-concept and Achievement among University Students as Related to their Psychological Adjustment.
(Unpublished M.Phil Thesis). National Institute of Psychology, Quaid-e-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Sanchez, F. J. P., & Roda, M. D. S. (2007). Relationship between Selfconcept and Academic Achievement in Primary Students. Almeria, Spain. P. 97.
Shafique, A. (2002). Relationship Between Academic Self-concept and Academic Achievement among School Children, National Institute of Psychology, Quaid-e-Azam University, Islamabad., Pakistan.
Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & G. C. Stanton.( 1976). Validation of Construct Interpretations. Review of Educational Research. 46, 407441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543046003407
Stern, J. D. (Ed.) (1994). The condition of education in rural schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Programs for the Improvement of Practice.
Schutz, P. A. (1997). Educational goals, strategies use, and the academic performance of high school students. High School Journal, 80, 193-201.
Walker, S., & Barton, L. (Eds.) (1989). Gender, class and education. London: Falmer.
Webster, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (2000). Accounting for variation in science and mathematics achievement: A multilevel analysis of Australian data. School Effectiveness and School Improvement,11, 339-360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1076/0924-3453(200009)11:3;1-G;FT339
William, B. (Ed.) (2004). Closing the achievement GAP: A vision for changing beliefs and practices. Virginia: ASCD.
Williams, J. H. (2005). Cross-national variations in rural mathematics achievement: A descriptive overview. Journal of Research in Rural Educ a t i on, 20, 1-18. Re t r i eved Apr i l 27, 2005 f rom www.umaine.edu /jrre/20-5.htm.
Winship, C., & Sobel, M. E. (2004). Causal inferences in sociological studies. In M. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis (481503). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Woolfolk, A. E. (1998). Educational Psychology (74-75). Allyn & Bacon, USA.
Young, D. (1998). Rural and urban differences in student achievement in science and mathematics: A multilevel analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9, 386-418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345980090403
Young, D. (2000). Rural differences in student achievement: The effect of student perceptions. Educational Research and Evaluation, 6, 207-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1076/1380-3611(200009)6:3;1-A;FT207
Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Homework practices and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-efficacy and perceived responsibility beliefs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 397417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.05.003
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in selfregulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to selfefficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51