A Thought Experiment On Gravity Based On Falling Objects: Investigation Of Science Teachers’ Thinking Process





Gravity Based on Falling Objects, Physics Education, Thought Experiment


This study aims to analyse the thought processes of science teachers who are master students in scientific education using a thought experiment on gravity based on falling objects. The phenomenological study approach, one of the qualitative research methodologies, was used to achieve this aim. Purposive sampling was used to investigate eight science teachers continuing their master’s degrees. Data was collected through interviews and a thought experiment on gravity based on falling objects. The teachers participated in Face-to-face problem-solving sessions, thinking aloud and backward questioning sessions. Results reveal that the teachers mostly showed secondary effects as establishing a new amount of relationship, carrying out thought experiments to predict, and preferring scientific concepts and hypothetical simulations as sources of thinking. Likewise, spatial reasoning-symmetry-compound simulation and experience were equally and less frequently preferred. Results also show that science teachers had strong self-efficacy judgments, a mastery of the curriculum, an unpleasant attitude when dealing with difficulties, and hypothetical thinking skills.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...




How to Cite

Uyar, F. K., & Karamustafaoglu, O. (2023). A Thought Experiment On Gravity Based On Falling Objects: Investigation Of Science Teachers’ Thinking Process. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends and Practices, 13(2), 404–423. https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2023/v13/i2/2456


Acar, H., & Gurel, Z. (2016). Investigating students’ inertia concept through thought experiments. Bogazici University Journal of Education, 33(2), 69-96. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/buje/issue/29693/319545

Avidov-Ungar, O., & Forkosh-Baruch, A. (2018). Professional identity of teacher educators in the digital era in light of demands of pedagogical innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 183-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.017

Bagceci, B., & Kinay, I. (2013). Investigation of teachers’ problem-solving skills according to some variables. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 12(44), 335-347. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/esosder/issue/6158/82777

Baldy, E., & Aubert, F. (2005). Etude de l’apprentissage du phénomène physique de la chute des corps en classe de 3ème française/Phenomenon of falling in French grade 9. Didaskalia, 27, 109-131. https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/23948 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/23948

Bar, V., Zinn, B., & Rubin, E. (1997). Children’s ideas about action at a distance. International Journal of Science Education, 19(10), 1137-1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970191003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970191003

Bergson, H. (2013). Les deux sources de la morale et de la religion. Paris: Nouveau Monde. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.14375/NP.9782369434184 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14375/NP.9782369434184

Boydak, H. A. (2017). Mystery of the brain hemispheres (3rd ed.). Istanbul: Beyaz.

Brown, J. R. (1991). The laboratory of the mind: Thought experiments in the natural sciences (1st edition). London and Newyork: Routledge.

Bunzl, M. (1996). The logic of thought experiments. Synthese, 106, 227-240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413701

Clement, J. (2008). Creative model construction in scientists and students. USA: Springer. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6712-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6712-9

Contreras, J. N. (2013). Fostering mathematical creativity through problem posing and modelling using dynamic geometry: Viviani’s problem in the classroom. Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 4(2),66-72. https://doi.org/10.7916/jmetc.v4i2.632

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston, USA: Pearson Education.

Damasio, A. R. (2006). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. London: Vintage Books.

Daniel, E. (2016). The usefulness of qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in researching problem-solving ability in science education curriculum. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(15), 1735-2222. Retrieved from https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/30822/31645

Faisal, & Martin, S. N. (2019). Science education in Indonesia: past, present, and future. Asia-Pasific Science Education, 5(4), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0032-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0032-0

Frank, O. T. (2013). The importance of implementing creativity in generating ideas activities. In M. Lesjak, A. Brezovec, & H. Nemec-Rudez (Eds.), Innovative marketing for coastal destinations (p. 25-30). Slovenia: University of Primorska Press.

Galili, I. (2001). Weight versus gravitational force: Historical and educational perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 23(10),1073-1093. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110038585 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110038585

Gelen, I., Duran, V., & Ozer, B. (2017). The analysis of some thought experiments in terms of the dimensions of hypothetico-creative reasoning skills. Jokull Journal, 67(2), 102-125.

Gendler, T. (1998). Galileo and the indispensability of scientific thought experiment. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 49, 397-424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/49.3.397

Gilbert, J. K., & Reiner, M. (2000). Thought experiments in science education: Potential and current realization. International Journal of Science Education, 22(3), 265-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900289877 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900289877

Johnson, H. J., & Cotterman, M. E. (2015). Developing preservice teachers’ knowledge of science teaching through video clubs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(4), 393-417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9429-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9429-0

Kuhn, T. (1963). The function of dogma in scientific research. In A. Crombie (Ed.), Scientific change (p. 347-369). New York: Basic Books.

Lindsay, R. K. (1988). Images and reference. Cognition, 29(3), 229-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90025-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90025-X

Nitsche, S. R. (2020). A historical analysis of thought experiments. Controversia, Sao Leopoldo, 16(3), 99-121. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v12i4.5814

Nuroso, H., Siswanto, J., & Huda, C. (2018). Developing a learning model to promote the skills of analytical thinking. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 12(4), 775-780. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v12i4.5814 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v12i4.5814

Ozel, M. (2004). Strategies for a successful physics education. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 16(16), 79-88. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/pauefd/issue/11127/133071

Puspitasari, L., In’am, A., & Syaifuddin, M. (2018). Analysis of students’ creative thinking in solving arithmetic problems. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 49-60. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3962 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3962

Raes, A., Schellens, T., & De Wever, B. D. (2014). Web-based collaborative inquiry to bridge gaps in secondary science education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(3), 316-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.836656 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.836656

Sorensen, R. A. (1992). Thought experiments. New York: Oxford University Press.

Tian, Y., Xiao, W., Li, C., Liu, Y., Qin, M., Wu, Y., ... H (2014). Virtual microscopy system at Chinese medical university: an assisted teaching platform for promoting active learning and problem-solving skills. BMC Medical Education, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-74 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-74

Uyar, F. K., & Karamustafaoglu, O. (2022). Analysis of the thinking process of science teachers: the light absorption thought experiment. Indonesian Journal of Physics Education, 18(2), 96-106. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v18i2.34243 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v18i2.34243

Van Harpen, X. Y., & Sriraman, B. (2013). Creativity and mathematical problem posing: An analysis of high school students’ mathematical problem posing in China and the USA. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(2), 201-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9419-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9419-5

Velentzas, A., & Halkia, K. (2013). The use of thought experiments in teaching physics to upper secondary-level students: two examples from the theory of relativity. International Journal of Science Education, 35(18), 3026-3049. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.682182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.682182

Vosdianou, S. (1994). Capturing and modelling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 54-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90018-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90018-3

Watts, D. M. (1982). Gravity- Don’t take it for granted! International Journal of Science Education, 17(4), 116-121. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/17/3/306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/17/3/306

Wilkes, K. V. (1988). Real people: Personal identity without thought experiments. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Witt-Hansen, J. (1976). H.C. Orsted, Kant and The Thought Experiment. Danish Yearbook of Philosophy, 13, 48-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/24689300-01301004

Wulandari, I. G. A. P. A., Sa’dijah, C., As’ari, A. R., & Rahardjo, S. (2018). Modified guided discovery model: a conceptual framework for designing a learning model using guided discovery to promote stu- dent’s analytical thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028,12153. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012153

Yuruk, N., Cakir, O. S., & Geban, O. (2000). The effect of conceptual change approach on high school students’ attitudes towards biology lesson about cellular respiration. In Iv. science and mathematics education congress. Ankara, Turkey.

Zhu, C., Wang, D., Cai, Y., & Engels, N. (2013). What core competencies are related to teachers’ innovative teaching? Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 9-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2012.753984 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2012.753984